Бюллетень науки и практики, 2018, том 4, № 8

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

2

ISSN 2414-2948

Издательский центр «Наука и практика».
Е. С. Овечкина.
Том 4. Номер 8.

БЮЛЛЕТЕНЬ НАУКИ И ПРАКТИКИ
Научный журнал.
Август 2018 г.

Издается с декабря 2015 г.
Выходит один раз в месяц.
16+

Главный редактор Е. С. Овечкина

Редакционная коллегия: З. Г. Алиев, К. Анант, Р. Б. Баймахан, Р. К. Верма, В. А. Горшков–Кантакузен, Е. В.
Зиновьев, С. Ш. Казданян, С. В. Коваленко, Д. Б. Косолапов, Н. Г. Косолапова, Р. А. Кравченко, Н. В. Кузина,
К. И. Курпаяниди, Ф. Ю. Овечкин (отв. ред.), Р. Ю. Очеретина, Т. Н. Патрахина, И. В. Попова, А. В. Родионов,
С. К. Салаев,
П. Н. Саньков,
Е. А. Сибирякова,
С. Н. Соколов,
С. Ю. Солдатова,
Л. Ю. Уразаева,

А. М. Яковлева.

Адрес редакции:
628605, Нижневартовск, ул. Ханты–Мансийская, 17
Тел. +7(3466)437769
http://www.bulletennauki.com
E–mail: bulletennaura@inbox.ru, bulletennaura@gmail.com

Свидетельство о регистрации ЭЛ №ФС 77-66110 от 20.06.2016

Журнал «Бюллетень науки и практики» включен в Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, ERIH PLUS (European

Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences), в международную информационную систему AGRIS,
фонды Всероссийского института научной и технической информации (ВИНИТИ РАН), научную электронную
библиотеку eLIBRARY.RU (РИНЦ), электронно–библиотечную систему IPRbooks, электронно–библиотечную
систему «Лань», информационную матрицу аналитики журналов (MIAR), ACADEMIA, Google Scholar,
ZENODO, AcademicKeys (межуниверситетская библиотечная система), польской научной библиотеке (Polish
Scholarly Bibliography (PBN)), ЭБС Znanium.com, индексируется в международных базах: ResearchBib
(Academic Resource Index), Index Copernicus Search Articles, The Journals Impact Factor (JIF), Международном
обществе по научно–исследовательской деятельности (ISRA), Scientific Indexing Services (SIS), Евразийский
научный индекс журналов (Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI), Join the Future of Science and Art Evaluation,
Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI), International Innovative Journal Impact Factor (IIJIF), Социальная Сеть
Исследований Науки (SSRN), Scientific world index (научный мировой индекс) (SCIWIN), Cosmos Impact
FactoR, CiteFactor, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), International institute of organized research (I2OR),
Directory of Research Journals Indexing (справочник научных журналов), Internet Archive, Scholarsteer,
директория индексации и импакт–фактора (DIIF), Advanced Science Index (АСИ), International Accreditation and
Research Council IARC (JCRR), Open Science Framework, Universal Impact Factor (UIF), Российский импакт–
фактор.

Импакт–факторы журнала: РИНЦ — 0,309; MIAR — 3,0; ICV — 79.69; GIF — 0,454; DIIF — 1,08;

InfoBase Index — 1,4; Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI) — 0,350, Universal Impact Factor (UIF) — 0,1502;

Journal Citation Reference Report (JCR–Report) — 1,021; Российский импакт–фактор — 0,15, 

SJIF— 3.348.

Тип лицензии CC поддерживаемый журналом: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
В журнале рассматриваются вопросы развития мировой и региональной науки и практики. Для ученых,
преподавателей, аспирантов, студентов.

Бюллетень науки и практики. 2018. Т. 4. №8. Режим доступа: http://www.bulletennauki.com

©Издательский центр «Наука и практика»

Нижневартовск, Россия

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

3

ISSN 2414-2948

Publishing center Science and Practice.
E. Ovechkina.
Volume 4, Issue 8.

BULLETIN OF SCIENCE AND PRACTICE
Scientific Journal.
August 2018.

Published since December 2015.
Schedule: monthly.
16+

Editor–in–chief E. Ovechkina

Editorial Board: Z. Aliev, Ch. Ananth, R. Baimakhan, V. Gorshkov–Cantacuzène, S. Kazdanyan, S. Kovalenko, D. 
Kosolapov, N. Kosolapova, R. Kravchenko, N. Kuzina, K. Kurpayanidi, R. Ocheretina, F. Ovechkin (executive editor), 
T. Patrakhina, I. Popova, S. Salaev, P. Sankov, E. Sibiryakova, S. Sokolov, S. Soldatova, A. Rodionov, L. Urazaeva, R. 
Verma, A. Yakovleva, E. Zinoviev.

Address of the editorial office:
628605, Nizhnevartovsk, Khanty–Mansiyskaya str., 17.
Phone +7(3466)437769
http://www.bulletennauki.com
E–mail: bulletennaura@inbox.ru, bulletennaura@gmail.com

The certificate of registration EL no. FS 77-66110 of 20.6.2016.

The Bulletin of Science and Practice Journal is Ulrich’s Periodicals Directory, ERIH PLUS (European Reference 
Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences), AGRIS, included ALL–Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical 
Information (VINITI), in scientific electronic library (RINTs), the Electronic and library system IPRbooks, the 
Electronic and library system Lanbook, MIAR, ZENODO, ACADEMIA, Google Scholar, AcademicKeys 
(interuniversity library system Polish Scholarly Bibliography (PBN), the Electronic and library system 
Znanium.com, is indexed in the international bases: ResearchBib (Academic Resource Index), Index Copernicus 
Search Articles, The Journals Impact Factor (JIF), the International society on research activity (ISRA), Scientific 
Indexing Services (SIS), the Eurasian scientific index of Journals (Eurasian Scientific Journal Index (ESJI) Join the 
Future of Science and Art Evaluation, Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI), International Innovative Journal 
Impact Factor (IIJIF), Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Scientific world index (SCIWIN), Cosmos Impact 
FactoR, BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine), CiteFactor, International Institute of organized research (I2OR), 
Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), Internet Archive, Scholarsteer, Directory of Indexing and Impact 
Factor (DIIF), Advanced Science Index (АSI), International Accreditation and Research Council IARC (JCRR), 
Open Science Framework, Universal Impact Factor (UIF), Russian Impact Factor (RIF).

Impact–factor: RINTs — 0,309; MIAR — 3.0; ICV — 79.69; GIF — 0.454; DIIF — 1.08; InfoBase Index — 1.4;

Open Academic Journals Index (OAJI) — 0.350, Universal Impact Factor (UIF) — 0.1502;

Journal Citation Reference Report (JCR–Report) — 1.021; Russian Impact Factor (RIF) — 0.15; SJIF— 3.348.

License type supported CC: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
The Journal addresses issues of global and regional Science and Practice. For scientists, teachers, graduate students, 
students.

(2018). Bulletin of Science and Practice, 4(8). Available at: http://www.bulletennauki.com

©Publishing center Science and Practice

Nizhnevartovsk, Russia

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

4

СОДЕРЖАНИЕ

Биологические науки

1.
Эндара А.
Оценка качества воды с использованием данных о донных макробеспозвоночных в 
реке Сардинас и ручье Ла Делисия в Эквадоре …………………………………………
10–17

2.
Ручин А. Б.
Влияние монохроматического освещения на раннее развитие земноводных в 
эксперименте ………………………………………………………………………………
18–27

Медицинские науки

3.
Волобуев А. Н., Романчук Н. П., Пятин В. Ф.
Циркадианная эпигенетика болезни Альцгеймера ……………………………………
28–44

4.
Харбедия Ш. Д., Алхазишвили А. В.
Оценка организации проведения магнитно-резонансной томографии у детей в 
условиях многопрофильного стационара ………………………………………………
45–52

5.
Моисеева К. Е., Соболев И. Б., Алексеева А. В., Харбедия Ш. Д.
Заболеваемость подросткового населения, проживающего в сельской местности …
53–59

6.
Соболев И. Б., Алексеева А. В., Полетов С. В.
Оценка кадрового обеспечения районной больницы …………………………………
60–68

7.
Березкина Е. Н.
Некоторые результаты оценки удовлетворенности врачей детской клинической 
больницы условиями и режимом труда …………………………………………………
69–76

Сельскохозяйственные науки

8.
Поволоцкая Ю. С., Федюшкин А. В.
Влияние минеральных удобрений на урожай и качество зерна озимой пшеницы 
сорта Губернатор Дона, возделываемого по непаровым предшественникам …………
77–83

9.
Кувшинов А. А., Сахаров В. А., Мазнев Д. С.
Совершенствование очесывающего устройства для уборки сои ………………………
84–89

10.
Михалев В. В., Шульженко Е. А.
Замена производства сена использованием в кормлении скота соевой половы ……
90–93

11.
Шишкин В. В., Усанов В. С., Шишкина Г. Ю.
Влияние соево-кукурузного соотношения в питательном субстрате на активность 
пробиотической культуры ………………………………………………………………
94–99

12.
Гуламов С. Б.
Инфильтрация воды при капельном орошении …………………………………………
100–108

13.
Мирзасолиев М. М.
Подбор сортов лука для выращивания в повторной культуре через рассаду …………
109–112

14.
Дурманов А. Ш.
Кооперация как основа увеличения экономической эффективности возделывания 
овощей в защищенных условиях ………………………………………………………
113–122

Науки о Земле

15.
Григорьев М. А., Григорьев А. М., Денекин И. А.
Гидрохимическая обстановка миоценовых отложений в зоне сочленения ЗападноКубанского и Керченско-Таманского прогибов (на примере Благовещенской и 
Джигинской площадей) …………………………………………………………………
123–129

Технические науки

16.
Ши Ю. Ю., Левцев А. П., Поворов С. В.
Цикл с рекуперацией тепла системы смазки дизельных генераторов ………………
130–135

17.
Панахов Т. М., Исаева А. А., Рефиев Н. М.
Магнитооптические свойства аморфных лент на основе CoFe ………………………
136–143

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

5

18.
Рагимова М. С., Гафаров Ф. М.
Некоторые особенности магистрального трубопроводного транспорта при 
проектировании и реконструкции ………………………………………………………
144–147

19.
Вакуров А. Е., Абросимов И. П.
Описание и преимущества технологии производства бетона из диоксида углерода в 
строительстве ……………………………………………………………………………
148–153

20.
Беркетова Л. В., Еремина С. В.
Протеинсодержащие продукты - как альтернатива источникам белка в рационе ……
154–161

Экономические науки

21.
Мандрон В. В., Башлакова М. А.
Ликвидация кредитных организаций: количественный и качественный анализ ……
162–168

22.
Швайба Д. Н.
Методика обоснования предметной области прогноза социально-экономической 
безопасности промышленного сектора …………………………………………………
169–176

23.
Швайба Д. Н.
Содержание прогноза социально-экономической безопасности промышленного 
сектора Республики Беларусь ……………………………………………………………
177–182

24.
Глущенко В. В.
Методология системного противодействия коррупции и математические методы в 
коррупциологии …………………………………………………………………………...
183–211

25.
Манушина А. П., Торукало Ю. Е.
Таможенно-тарифное регулирование и развитие авиационной отрасли в России …
212–217

26.
Манушина А. П., Лашманова О. Г., Лосева Ю. Ю., Юрьева И. Г.
Таможенно-тарифное регулирование в странах ЕАЭС в период с 2014 по 2017 гг. …
218–224

27.
Манушина А. П., Борзуков И. А., Григорьева Я. Д.
Таможенно-тарифное регулирование перемещения черных металлов и изделий из 
них через таможенную границу КНР ……………………………………………………
225–231

28.
Мамаджонов Д. Г.
Направления экономического развития и повышения эффективности управления 
промышленного сектора в Республике Узбекистан ……………………………………
232–236

29.
Михайлова А. В., Попова Л. Н.
Технологии управления персоналом для вахтовых работников (на примере 
Республики Саха (Якутия)) ………………………………………………………………
237–243

Социологические науки

30.
Бахромова Д. Б.
Экономико-статистический анализ основных направлений социальной защиты 
населения ………………………………………………………………………………….
244–250

31.
Бахромова Д. Б.
Теоретические аспекты совершенствования социальной защиты населения ………...
251–256

32.
Сергеева Т. А.
Транспарентность, метаэтика, нормативная этика и прикладная этика как элементы 
в управлении организации ………………………………………………………………..
257–261

33.
Сергеева Т. А.
Управление конфликтами в современном обществе ……………………………………
262–267

Юридические науки

34.
Жиянмуратова Г. Ш.
Электоральная деятельность как фактор политической социализации молодежи …...
268–272

35.
Олламов А. Я.
Олий Мажлис Республики Узбекистан и его деятельность по сравнению с 
деятельностью парламентов других государств ………………………………………...
273–278

36.
Фарион К. Ю.
Некоторые аспекты жилого помещения как объекта права собственности …………..
279–285

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

6

Психологические науки

37.
Черникова Т. В., Шнейдер В. В.
Доктор на охране материнского и детского здоровья в Казахстане и Германии: две 
психологические модели сопротивления выгоранию …………………………………..
286–292

Педагогические науки

38.
Беляева В. С.
Конфликты между учениками в общеобразовательном учреждении и пути их 
разрешения ………………………………………………………………………………...
293–297

Философские науки

39.
Петрова С. И.
О потребностях, интересах и мотивах деятельности человека ………………………..
298–302

40.
Глущенко В. В.
Общая теория прав человека (наука о правах физических и юридических лиц) ……..
303–339

Культурология

41.
Петров И. Ф.
Личность в контексте культурной социальной среды (на примере деятельности 
учреждений культуры) ……………………………………………………………………
340–343

Филологические науки

42.
Грудева Е. А., Чвалун Р. В.
Актуализация образного и аксиологического компонентов концепта autumn в 
поэтических текстах XIX века …………………………………………………………...
344–348

43.
Кахраманова Е.
Характерные особенности категории падежа в акцентах азербайджанского языка ….
349–355

44.
Нифталийева Э. Г. 
Энантиосемия в творчестве Низами Гянджеви и Гатрана Тебризи ……………………
356–360

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Biological Sciences

1.
Endara A.
Evaluation of water quality through benthic macroinvertebrates in the Sardinas river and 
La Delicia stream in Ecuador ………………………………………………………………
10–17

2.
Ruchin A.
Effect of monochromatic light on early development of Amphibians in experiments ……
18–27

Medical Sciences

3.
Volobuev A., Romanchuk N., Pyatin V.
Circadian epigenetics of Alzheimer’s disease ……………………………………………
28–44

4.
Kharbedia Sh., Alkhazishvili A.
Evaluation of the organization of magnetic resonance tomography in children under the 
conditions of a multidisciplinary stationary ………………………………………………
45–52

5.
Moiseeva K., Sobolev I., Alekseeva, A. Kharbedia Sh.
Morbidity of adolescent population in rural location ………………………………………
53–59

6.
Sobolev I., Alekseeva A., Poletov S.
Assessment of the human security of a district hospital …………………………………
60–68

7.
Berezkina E.
Some results of assessing the satisfaction of doctors in a Children’s Clinical Hospital with 
conditions and a work regime ……………………………………………………………
69–76

Agricultural Sciences

8.
Рovolotskaya Yu., Fedyushkin A.
The effect of mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of winter wheat varieties 
Gubernator Dona, cultivated by non-fallow predecessors …………………………………
77–83

9.
Kuvshinov A., Sakharov V., Maznev D.
Improvement of the combing device for harvesting soybeans ……………………………
84–89

10.
Mikhalev V., Shulzhenko E.
Replacement of manufacturing of hay by use soy chaff in farm animals feeding …………
90–93

11.
Shishkin V., Usanov V., Shishkina G.
Influence of soy-corner ratio in the nutrient medium on the growth of probiotic culture …
94–99

12.
Gulamov S.
Infiltration of water during drip irrigation …………………………………………………
100–108

13.
Mirzasoliev M.
Selection of onions varieties for cultivation in re-culture through seedlings ………………
109–112

14.
Durmanov A.
Cooperation as a basis for increasing the economic efficiency in protected cultivation of 
vegetables ………………………………………………………..........................................
113–122

Sciences about the Earth

15.
Grigoriev M., Grigoriev А., Denekin I.
Hydrochemical situation of myocenous deposits in the zone of articulation of the West 
Kuban and Kerch-Taman troughs (on the example of Blagoveshchenskaya and 
Dzhiginskaya square) ………………………………………………………………………
123–129

Technical Sciences

16.
Shi Y. Y., Levtsev A., Povorov S.
The loop with heat recovery of diesel generator lubrication system ………………………
130–135

17.
Panahov T., Isayeva A., Refiyev N.
Magnetooptical properties of amorphous ribbon based on CoFe …………………………
136–143

18.
Rahimova M., Gafarov F.
Some of the features of the main pipeline transport in their designing and reconstruction ..
144–147

19.
Vakurov A., Abrosimov I.
CarbonCure Technologies ………………………………………………………………….
148–153

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

8

20.
Berketova L., Eremina S.
Proteinaceous products as alternative protein sources in the diet …………………………
154–161

Economic Sciences

21.
Mandron V., Bashlakova M.
The liquidation of credit institutions: quantitative and qualitative analysis ………………
162–168

22.
Shvaiba D.
Methods of substantiation of the subject area of the forecast of socio-economic security of 
the industrial sector ………………………………………………………………………
169–176

23.
Shvaiba D.
The content of the forecast of socio-economic security of the industrial sector of the 
Republic of Belarus ………………………………………………………………………
177–182

24.
Glushchenko V.
Methodology of systemic counteraction of corruption and mathematical methods in 
corruption …………………………………………………………………………………..
183–211

25.
Manushina А., Torukalo Yu.
Customs and tariff regulation and development of the aviation industry in Russia ………
212–217

26.
Manushina А., Lashmanova O., Loseva Yu., Yurieva I.
Customs and tariff regulation on the Eurasian Economic Union from 2014 to 2017 ……
218–224

27.
Manushina А., Borzukov I., Grigorieva Ya.
Customs and tariff regulation of movement of iron and steel and articles of iron and steel 
through the customs border of People’s Republic of China ………………………………
225–231

28.
Mamajonov D.
Directions of economic development and increase of efficiency of management of 
industrial sector in the Republic of Uzbekistan ……………………………………………
232–236

29.
Mikhailova A., Popova L.
Technologies of personnel management for shift workers (on the example of the Republic 
of Sakha (Yakutia)) ………………………………………………………………………...
237–243

Sociological Sciences

30.
Bakhramova D.
Economic statistical analysis of the basic directions of social protection of the population 
244–250

31.
Bakhramova D.
Theoretical aspects of perfection of social protection of the population …………………..
251–256

32.
Sergeeva T.
Transparency, meta-ethics, normative ethics and applied ethics as elements in the 
management of the organization …………………………………………………………...
257–261

33.
Sergeeva T.
Conflict management in modern society …………………………………………………...
262–267

Juridical Sciences

34.
Jianmuratova G.
Electoral activity as factor of political socialization of youth ……………………………...
268–272

35.
Ollamov A.
The Oliy Majlis of Republic of Uzbekistan and its foreign resembles’ activities in 
comparison …………………………………………………………………………………
273–278

36.
Farion K.
Some aspects of the residential premise as the object of the ownership right ……………..
279–285

Psychological Sciences

37.
Chernikova T., Shneider V.
Doctor as a guard of mothers and babies’ health in Kazakhstan and Germany: two 
psychological models of burnout resistance ………………………………………………..
286–292

Pedagogical Sciences

38.
Belyaeva V.
Conflicts between students in educational institution and ways of solving them ………….
293–297

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

9

Philosophical Sciences

39.
Petrova S.
About the needs, interests and motives of human activity …………………………………
298–302

40.
Glushchenko V.
General theory of human rights (the science of the rights of individuals and legal entities) 
303–339

Culturology

41.
Petrov I.
Personality in the context of cultural social environment (on the example of cultural 
institutions) …………………………………………………………………………………
340–343

Philological Sciences

42.
Grudeva E., Chvalun R.
Figurative and axiological components of the concept autumn in poetic texts of the XIX 
century ……………………………………………………………………………………...
344–348

43.
Kahramanova E.
Characteristic features of the case category in the accents of the Azerbaijani language …..
349–355

44.
Niftaliyeva E.
The process of enantiosemy in Nizami Ganjavi and Gatran Tabrizi’s creative works …….
356–360

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

10

БИОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ / BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES

________________________________________________________________________________________________

UDC 574.58
AGRIS M40

EVALUATION OF WATER QUALITY THROUGH 

BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES IN THE SARDINAS 

RIVER AND LA DELICIA STREAM IN ECUADOR

©Endara A., ORCID: 0000-0003-0629-0638, Magister in Science,

Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial (UTE),

Equinoctial Technological University,

Quito, Ecuador, maria.endara@ute.edu.ec

ОЦЕНКА КАЧЕСТВА ВОДЫ С ИСПОЛЬЗОВАНИЕМ ДАННЫХ
О ДОННЫХ МАКРОБЕСПОЗВОНОЧНЫХ В РЕКЕ САРДИНАС

И РУЧЬЕ ЛА ДЕЛИСИЯ В ЭКВАДОРЕ

©Эндара А., ORCID: 0000-0003-0629-0638, Магистр,

Технологический университет «Экиноксиаль»,

г. Кито, Эквадор, maria.endara@ute.edu.ec

Abstract. The present study characterized the macrobenthic entomofauna of the Sardinas river 

and the La Delicia stream. Their environmental quality water was determined by applying 
the BMWP/Col (Biological Monitoring Working Party for Colombia) index in two sampling points, 
distributed in the Sardinas river and La Delicia stream, during the months of May and June 2017. 
For its collection, a Surber net was used. In the laboratory, they were classified and identified in 
class, order and family levels. The specimens were analyzed by calculating the richness (S), 
abundance (N) and relative abundance (%). A total of 90 individuals belonging to 16 morphospecies 
were collected. The Hemiptera order with the Veliidae family was the most abundant, encompassing 
most of the organisms collected 33.33%. The less represented group was the order Diptera 
with the family Tipulidae with 1.52% of the individuals collected. The water quality was Moderate 
for the river Sardinas (BMWP/Col 59) and Good for the La Delicia stream (BMWP/Col 75). 
The present study characterized the community of macroinvertebrates in the study area and 
the ecological quality of the studied bodies of water.

Аннотация. В настоящем исследовании характеризуется донная энтомофауна реки 

Сардинас и ручья Ла Делисия и определяется качество окружающей среды путем 
применения индекса BMWP/Col (Рабочая группа по биологическому мониторингу для 
Колумбии) в двух пунктах отбора проб, расположенных на реке Сардинас и ручье 
Ла Делисия и выполненных в течение мая и июня 2017 года. При отборе проб использовалась 
сеть Surber. В лаборатории была проведена классификация и идентификация по уровням 
класса, отряда и семейства. Образцы анализировались путем расчета богатства видов (S), 
численности (N) и относительной численности (%). Было собрано в общей сложности 
90 морфологических образцов, принадлежащих к 16 морфологическим разновидностям. 
Семейство Велии (Veliidae) из отряда Полужесткокрылых (Hemiptera) оказалось самым 
распространенным, представленным большинством отобранных в пробах организмов 
(33,33%). Наименее представленной группой было семейство Караморы (Tipulidae) из отряда 
Двукрылые (Diptera) составляющей 1,52% от числа отобранных особей. Качество воды 

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

11

оказалось удовлетворительным для реки Сардинас (59 по BMWP/Col) и хорошим в ручье 
Ла Делисия (75 по BMWP/Col). В данном исследовании была определена динамика 
популяций макробеспозвоночных в исследуемой зоне и экологическое качество исследуемых 
водоемов.

Keywords: aquatic entomofauna, environmental quality, richness and abundance.

Ключевые слова: водная энтомофауна, качество окружающей среды, богатство видов, 

численность.

Introduction

The accelerated growth of the human population, industrialization and urbanization are causes 

directly associated with water pollution [1]. Initially, water quality was evaluated only by physical–
chemical data, which analyzed the effects of short-term pollution. However, in the 1950 s, 
biological methods for determining water quality developed extensively in Europe and it was found 
that water quality indicator organisms determine the long-term effects of impacts on the aquatic 
ecosystem [2].

The Parish of Pacto is located at the Northwestern end of the Metropolitan District of 

Quito at a distance of 84 km from the city. Its weather is humid and temperate. Temperatures 
oscillate between 17° and 20°C. It has a surface area of 346.14 km2. It is a mountainous region with 
an altitude ranging from 500 to 1,800 meters above sea level. It is crossed by the rivers: 
Guayllabamba, Mashpi, Sahuagal, Sardinas, San Jose, Pachijal, Anope, Chulupe, Gualcuyacu, Piripe, 
Pishashi, Chontal, San Francisco and Santana [3]. This area is considered agricultural with a great 
potential for eco–tourism, nature tourism, and as a conservation area [4].

The native vegetation of the Parish of Pacto is part of the montane forests of Ecuador, 

considered worldwide as zones of high diversity and endemism [5–9]. However, there are no 
studies that describe the community of macroinvertebrates and their degree of conservation. 
Therefore, in the present study the macrobenthic entomofauna of the Sardinas river and the La 
Delicia stream were characterized, and their environmental quality was determined through the 
application of the BMWP/Col Index (Biological Monitoring Working Party for Colombia) [10], in 
two sampling points, distributed in the river Sardinas and La Delicia stream, during the months of 
May and June 2017.

Material and research methods

Study Site: The Sardinas river and the La Delicia stream are located in the Province of 

Pichincha, Quito Canton, Pacto Parish. The inhabitants use them as a source of water for their pipe 
systems, for which there is uptake infrastructure. The Sardinas river has a strong current and a rocky 
substrate. The riparian vegetation corresponds to a secondary forest with little human activity. 
Sampling was carried out at the coordinates: 17N 074844S — UTM 0016926.

The La Delicia stream is a source of water of sloping topographic surface, which is between 

high points. According to erosion and lithology it could be characterized as regular. The water is 
colorless. It was possible to observe the presence of amphibians at the sample sites. The stream has 
a native vegetation cover, of a secondary forest type. The samples were taken at the coordinates: 
17N0742530 — UTM 0016243.

Field Phase: The field work was carried out in two sampling points that were determined 

taking into account the use of water for human consumption. The samples were taken in the months 
of May and June 2017. Coordinates were recorded with a GPS (Garmin, Oregon 550). A 50m long 
transect parallel to the riverbank was established where 10 macro invertebrate sampling points were 

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

12

chosen randomly. In each selected point, during the course of a minute, the sampling technique with 
the Surber net was applied [11–12]. The collected organisms were placed in Ziplock–type bags 
[13] properly labeled and preserved in ethanol at 70% [14].

At each point pH, turbidity and conductivity were measured with a multi–parameter 

HACH device model HQ40d.

Laboratory Phase: In the laboratory, the organisms were separated from the substrate, using a 

sieve, watchmaker's tweezers, a white plastic tray, water, 95% ethanol, 3 ml. vacutainer tubes, and 
100 ml. plastic jars for the larger individuals. The macroinvertebrates collected were identified at 
the class, order and family level with the help of a technical level stereoscopic microscope with a 
binocular zoom Model ZMAB–ST2, with 10x eyepieces and lx and 4x lenses. The identification of 
the specimens was made through dichotomous keys: [9, 15–20].

Data Analysis: The following parameters of the aquatic macro invertebrate community 

were evaluated:

Richness of Species (S): Total number of species in each sampling point. [21]
Abundance (N): Total number of individuals recorded in each sampling point. [21].
Relative Abundance (%): Number of individuals of each morphospecies multiplied by 

one hundred and divided by the total recorded abundance in each body of water [21].

BMWP/Col (Biological Monitoring Working Party for Colombia): To determine water 

quality the BMWP/Col index was used [16].

Results and discussion

Aquatic Habitat Conditions: Table 1 details the environmental conditions of the Sardinas 

river and the La Delicia stream at the time of macro invertebrate sample collection (Table 1).

Table 1.

ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS OF THE SARDINAS RIVER AND LA DELICIA STREAM

Las Delicias stream
Sardinas river

T°C

pH

Turbidity NTU Conductivity µS/cm
T°C

pH

Turbidity NTU Conductivity µS/cm

23,40
6,00
14,90
158,00
21,00
5,80
3,92
25,70

18,80
6,80
6,20
45,00
25,20
7,50
4,94
130,70

18,70
7,70
4,80
46,00
21,00
7,50
3,92
130,70

20,30
6,83
8,63
83,00
22,40
6,93
4,26
95,70

Richness, Abundance and Relative Abundance: A total of 90 individuals were collected, 

belonging to 16 morphospecies. The Hemiptera order with the Veliidae family, was the most 
abundant. It encompassed most of the collected organisms 33.33%. The least represented group 
was the order Diptera with the Tipulidae family with 1.52% of collected individuals.

La Delicia stream ranked 5 out of 10 and the Sardinas river got 9. Abundance in 

La Delicia was of 24 collected individuals, and in the Sardinas river 66 collected individuals. 
Regarding relative abundance it can be said that in the La Delicia stream the dominant 
morphospecies was Veliidae which belongs to the Hemiptera order, with 8% of individuals, 
while the least abundant morpho–species belong to the Coleoptera orders (Notonectidae, 
Dytiscidae and Hydrophilidae), Ephemeroptera (Leptophlebiidae and Baetidae), Diptera 
(Simulidae) and Odonata (Coenagrionidae) with 1% of collected individuals (Figure 1).

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

13

Figure 1. Relative Abundance of Delicias Stream.

In the Sardinas river the most abundant morphospecies was Baetidae with 22.73% of 

collected individuals and the least abundant was Tipulidae with 1.52% of collected individuals. 
Regarding the distribution of the morphospecies, it can be said that it was much more 
heterogeneous in the Sardinas river than in the La Delicia stream (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Relative Abundance of Sardinas River.

BMWP/Col Index: Through the analysis of the BMWP/Col index it was determined that 

the quality of water in the La Delicia stream is Class II Good, slightly polluted water. (Figure 3).

Figure 3. BMWP/Col index of La Delicia Stream.

1,00
1,00
1,00

8,00

5,00

1,00
1,00
1,00
1,00

4,00

0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
7,00
8,00
9,00
%

15,15

10,61

19,70
22,73

1,52

6,06
3,03

16,67

4,55

0,00
5,00

10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00

%

3

10
9

7

3

9

3

5

10

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
BMWP/Col

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

14

The two sampled sites have different water quality. The La Delicia stream has better quality 

according to the BMWP / Col index. On the other hand, the Sardinas River has lower water quality. 
This is consistent with the information obtained from [21], who states the existence of a mining 
conflict in Pacto that is contaminating the Sardinas River in said community.

According to [22], the BMWP / Col is the ideal index to determine the water quality in the 

mountain ecosystem, because more than 97% of registered macroinvertebrate families are included 
in this quality index. Moreover, it is the most used index to evaluate the integrity of aquatic systems 
in Latin America [23]. Therefore the use of the index in the area would be the most appropriate 
methodology for determining water quality.

On the other hand, the Sardinas river is a Class III Moderate, moderately polluted water 

(Figure 4).

Figure 4. BMWP/Col index of Sardinas River.

Although the BMWP/Col index indicates that the Sardinas river has a Moderate quality, 

the presence of the Perlidae group that is observed constitutes a bioindicator of good water 
quality. The presence of this group may be due to the drift phenomenon [24] that could have 
dragged the group from other less contaminated bodies of water. 

Conclusions

The water quality of La Delicia stream is Good according to macroinvertebrate community 

described instead the Sardinas River has a regular quality.

Although during the present study the community of macroinvertebrates was well 

characterized it is necessary to carry out interannual sampling campaigns to understand
natural fluctuations caused by variations in the ecological flow and anthropic impacts that occur in 
this lotic system [25–27].

Acknowledgments: To the students that participated in the Community Relations Program 

of the Environmental Engineering and Natural Risk Management Career, who helped in the 
collection and preparation of specimens, for their identification in the laboratory and Daniel 
Arboleda who helps to the taxonomy identification and field work with the students.

Financing:
Universidad Tecnologica Equinoccial, Community Relations Project: 

Comprehensive Intervention in Environmental Management and Natural Hazards in the Pacto 
Parish. (Intervención Integral en Gestión Ambiental y de Riesgos Naturales en la Parroquia de 
Pacto. Project number: VINQUACII-2016-2).

3

10
9

7

3

9

3

5

10

0
2
4
6
8
10
12
BMWP/Col

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

15

References:

1. Courtemach, D., Davies, L., & Laverty, E. B. (1989). Incorporation of biological 

information in water quality planning. Environmental Management, 13, 35-41.

2. Figueroa, R., Araya, E., Parra, O., & Valdovinos, C. (1999). Macroinvertebrados bentónicos 

como indicadores de calidad de agua. Resúmenes Sexta Jornada del Comité Chileno para el 
Programa Hidrológico internacional, 1-24.

3. Paz y Miño, S. (2005). Centro para el desarrollo turístico de Pacto “CEPADET”. 

Universidad de especialidades Turísticas U.C.T. Tesis de Pregrado, 10-12.

4. Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Rural de Pacto (2012). Plan de Ordenamiento 

Territorial de Pacto, Elecciones. Pacto, Ecuador, 1-10.

5. Gentry, A. (1995). Patterns of diversity and floristic composition in neotropical montane 

forest. S. Churchill (ed.). Biodiversity and conservation of neotropical montane forest. New York,
New York Botanical Garden, 103-126.

6. Borchsenius, F. (1997). Patterns of plant species endemism in Ecuador. Biodiversity and 

Conservation, 6, 379-399.

7. Mittermeier, R., Myers, N., Robles-Gil, P., & Goettsch-Mittermeier, C. (1999). 

Biodiversidad amenazada. Las ecorregiones terrestres prioritarias del mundo. CEMEX S.A. de C.V. 
& Conservación Internacional, México DF.

8. Myers, N., Mittermeir, R., Mittermeir, C., da Fonseca, G., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity 

hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853-858.

9. Celi, J., Terneus, E., Torres, J., & Ortega, M. (2004). Dung beetles (Coleoptera: 

Scarabaeinae) diversity in an altitudinal gradient in the Cutucú range, Morona Santiago, Ecuadorian 
Amazon. Lyonia, 7(2), 37-52.

10. Roldán, G. (2003). Bioindicación de la calidad de agua en Colombia. Uso del método 

BMWP / Col. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Colombia, 170.

11. Garie, H., & McIntosh, A., (1986). Distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream 

exposed to urban runoff. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 22(3), 447-455.

12. Roldán, G. (1988). Guía para el Estudio de los Macroinvertebrados Acuáticos del 

Departamento de Antioquia. Editorial Presencia. Bogotá. Colombia.

13. Muzaffar, S., & Colbo, M. (2002). The effects of sampling technique on the ecological 

characterization of shallow, benthic macroinvertebrate communities in two Newfoundland ponds. 
Hidrobiología, 477(1-3), 31-39.

14. Jacobsen, D., & Encada, A., (1998). The macroinvertebrate fauna of Ecuadorian Highland 

streams in the wet and dry seasons, Hidrobiologie, 142(1), 53-70.

15. Merritt, R., & Cummins, K. (1988). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North 

America. Ed. Kendall / Hunt publishing company, USA.

16. Roldán, G. (1988). Guía para el Estudio de los Macroinvertebrados Acuáticos del 

Departamento de Antioquia. Editorial Presencia. Bogotá. Colombia.

17. Fernández, H., & Domínguez, E. (eds.). (2001). Guía para la Determinación de los 

Artrópodos Bentónicos Sudamericanos. Editorial Universitaria de Tucumán, Tucumán, Argentina, 
282.

18. Salles, F. (2006). As Ninfas de Ephemeroptera (Insecta) ocurrentes no Brasil. Tese. 

Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

19. Domínguez, E., & Fernández, H. R. (eds.). (2009). Macroinvertebrados bentónicos 

sudamericanos, Sistemática y Biología. Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina, 656.

20. Hamada, N., Nessimian, J., & Querino, R. (2014). Insetos aquáticos na Amazônia 

brasileira: taxonomia, biologia e ecologia. Editora do INPA, Manaos Brasil. 

Бюллетень науки и практики / Bulletin of Science and Practice

http://www.bulletennauki.com
Т. 4. №8. 2018

16

21. Moreno, C. E. (2001). ORCYT-UNESCO Oficina Regional de Ciencia y Tecnología para 

América Latina y el Caribe, UNESCO. Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (SEA).

22. Arroyo, C., & Encalada, A. C. (2009). Evaluación de la calidad de agua a través de 

macroinvertebrados bentónicos e índices biológicos en ríos tropicales en bosque de neblina 
montano, ACI Avances en Ciencias e Ingenierías, 1(1).

23. Ramírez, A., & Gutiérrez-Fonseca, P. E. (2014). Functional feeding groups of aquatic 

insect families in Latin America: a critical analysis and review of existing literature. Revista de 
Biología Tropical, 62, 155-167.

24. Margalef, R., (1983). Limnología. Editorial Omega, Universidad de Barcelona, España.
25. Jacobsen, D., & Encada, A. (1998). The macroinvertebrate fauna of Ecuadorian Highland 

streams in the wet and dry seasons. Hidrobiologie, 142(1), 53-70.

26. Encalada, A., & Ríos, B. (2011). Aprendizaje de las cuencas altoandinas: Proyecto 

FUCARA, Laboratorio de Ecología Acuática - USFQ, Quito.

27. Ríos-Touma, B., Prat, N., & Encalada, A. C. (2012). Invertebrate drift and colonization 

processes in a tropical Andean stream. Aquatic Biology, 14(3), 233-246.

Список литературы:

1. Courtemach D., Davies L., Laverty E. B. Incorporation of biological information in water 

quality planning // Environmental Management. 1989. №13. P. 35-41.

2. Figueroa R., Araya E., Parra O., Valdovinos C. Macroinvertebrados bentónicos como 

indicadores de calidad de agua // Resúmenes Sexta Jornada del Comité Chileno para el Programa 
Hidrológico internacional. 1999. P. 1-24.

3. Paz y Miño S. Centro para el desarrollo turístico de Pacto “CEPADET” // Universidad de 

especialidades Turísticas U.C.T. Tesis de Pregrado, 2005. P. 10-12.

4. Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Rural de Pacto // Plan de Ordenamiento Territorial de 

Pacto, Elecciones. Pacto, Ecuador, 2012. P. 1-10.

5. Gentry A. Patterns of diversity and floristic composition in neotropical montane forest // S. 

Churchill (ed.). Biodiversity and conservation of neotropical montane forest. New York: New York 
Botanical Garden, 1995. P. 103-126.

6. Borchsenius F. Patterns of plant species endemism in Ecuador // Biodiversity and 

Conservation. 1997. №6. P. 379-399.

7. Mittermeier R., Myers N., Robles-Gil P., Goettsch-Mittermeier C. Biodiversidad 

amenazada. Las ecorregiones terrestres prioritarias del mundo. CEMEX S. A. de C. V. & 
Conservación Internacional, México DF, 1999.

8. Myers N., Mittermeir R., Mittermeir C., da Fonseca G., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for 

conservation priorities // Nature. 2000. V. 403. P. 853-858.

9. Celi J., Terneus E., Torres J., Ortega M. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) diversity 

in an altitudinal gradient in the Cutucú range, Morona Santiago, Ecuadorian Amazon // Lyonia. 
2004. V. 7. №2. P. 37-52.

10. Roldán G. Bioindicación de la calidad de agua en Colombia. Uso del método BMWP / 

Col. Editorial Universidad de Antioquia. Colombia, 2003. 170 p.

11. Garie H., McIntosh A. Distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in a stream exposed to 

urban runoff // Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 1986. V. 22. №3. P. 447-455.

12. Roldán G. Guía para el Estudio de los Macroinvertebrados Acuáticos del Departamento de 

Antioquia. Editorial Presencia. Bogotá. Colombia, 1988.

13. Muzaffar S., Colbo M. The effects of sampling technique on the ecological 

characterization of shallow, benthic macroinvertebrate communities in two Newfoundland ponds // 
Hidrobiología. 2002. V. 477. №1-3. P. 31-39.