Книжная полка Сохранить
Размер шрифта:
А
А
А
|  Шрифт:
Arial
Times
|  Интервал:
Стандартный
Средний
Большой
|  Цвет сайта:
Ц
Ц
Ц
Ц
Ц

LINKING CHILD HEALTH, MATERNAL LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AND HOUSEHOLD ASSET ENDOWMENTS IN CAMEROON: WHAT THE PEOPLE SAY

Покупка
Основная коллекция
Артикул: 452958.0034.99.0001
Доступ онлайн
от 49 ₽
В корзину
Mbu, D. LINKING CHILD HEALTH, MATERNAL LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AND HOUSEHOLD ASSET ENDOWMENTS IN CAMEROON: WHAT THE PEOPLE SAY / D. Mbu, M. Aloysius, F. Menjo. - Текст : электронный // Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences. - 2014. - №10 (34) Октябр. - С. 3-17. - URL: https://znanium.com/catalog/product/502773 (дата обращения: 20.04.2024). – Режим доступа: по подписке.
Фрагмент текстового слоя документа размещен для индексирующих роботов. Для полноценной работы с документом, пожалуйста, перейдите в ридер.

RJOAS, 10(34), October 2014

LINKING CHILD HEALTH, MATERNAL LABOUR FORCE PARTICIPATION AND HOUSEHOLD ASSET ENDOWMENTS IN CAMEROON:
WHAT THE PEOPLE SAY

Mbu Daniel Tambi, Lecturer
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Dschang, Cameroon E-mail: tambimbu@yahoo.com

Aloysius Mom Njong, Associate professor Department of Economics, University of Bamenda, Cameroon E-mail: mom aloys@yahoo.fr

Menjo Francis Baye, Professor
Department of Economics and Management, University of Yaounde II, Cameroon E-mail: bayemenjo@yahoo.com

ABSTRACT
This paper is targeted objectives: to document the determinants of child health as informed by focus group discussion, to analyze what the people say concerning the relationship between child health and maternal labour force participation, to explore the perception of the people on the effects of child health on asset accumulation and to suggest public policies on the basis of the findings. We used seven focus groups to explore what the people say based on different health domains: access to public goods; inputs to health; benefits from better health; better child health and complementary activities; benefits of maternity leave and better child health, decision making concerning family health. Each focus group was made of eight participants: housewife, traders, farmers, drivers, teachers, technicians, medical personnel and military drawn from different religious groups: catholic, protestant mainline, protestant non-mainline, other protestant, Muslim, systemic and traditional belief. We observed that, parents make used of the extra time accrue to them due to better health for their children and family to do extra work that fetched them money. The increased family income is use to send their children to better schools, carter for their wellbeing as well as to promote asset growth and redistribution, thus, improving economic well-being and reducing poverty. In case of retirement or sudden retrenchment from the labour market, parents make use of the accumulated assets to increase their family income and maintain well-being, hence, reducing the psychological trauma on parents due to poverty. Based on these findings, we recommend that decision makers and actors concern with child health issues should considered, ease and promote child health outcomes. This is a key to narrowing the poverty and inequality gap between the poor and non-poor, rural and urban household residence, married and unmarried, employed and the unemployed, promote maternal labour force participation and household wealth accumulation in Cameroon.

KEY WORDS
Cameroon; Child health; Household asset endowment; Maternal labour force; Participation.

     The use of focus group discussion in health issues is gradually gaining grounds in health economics. Focus Group Discussion (FGD) entails gathering people from similar backgrounds or experiences together to discuss a specific topic of interest (Bender and Ewbank, 1994). It may also be considered as a group discussion of approximately 6 to 12 persons who are guided by a facilitator, during which group members talk freely and spontaneously about issues of interest such as child health. The strength of focus group relies on allowing the participants to agree or disagree with each other so that it provides an insight into how people think about health issues. The range of opinions, ideas, inconsistencies and variations that exist in the discussion in terms of beliefs, experiences and practices provide adequate information for qualitative research analysis (Merton, 1956; Zimmerman et al., 1990).


3

Доступ онлайн
от 49 ₽
В корзину